An overlooked use for LLMs – at least in their current forms – in educational contexts is as reflective tools for developing writers to see how their choices might impact various audiences in ways they did not intend. If we think of ChatGPT’s responses as “black mirrors” of the human user’s inputs, then the user can take the initiative to examine their own inputs in a way reminiscent of Jungian “shadow work.” By rhetorically analyzing each session with an LLM, students can investigate what can safely be assumed about the technology’s guardrails, biases, and other limitations. By explicating on the…
Recent Posts
- C&W 2025 Session Review: “Whose Time is It, Anyway?” (Keynote)
- 2025 C&W Session Review: From Chatbot to Classroom: Understanding Student and Instructor Use and Perceptions of AI (Session C)
- 2025 C&W Session Review: “Invention, AI, and Circulation” (Session F)
- 2025 C&W Session Review: “Moving through Space” (Session H)
- Blog Carnival 23: Editor’s Outro: “Digital Circulation in Rhetoric and Writing Studies
- Collage as Socialist Circulation
- Play, Rhetoric, and the Circulation of J.D. Vance Photoshops
- Attending to Scales of Intensity: A Viral/Chronological Method for Researching the Circulation of Activist Rhetoric