Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the broken-link-checker domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the bunyad domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893
{"id":11498,"date":"2015-07-26T21:20:43","date_gmt":"2015-07-27T01:20:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/?p=11498"},"modified":"2023-11-03T15:46:24","modified_gmt":"2023-11-03T19:46:24","slug":"c2-gonzales-and-devoss-remixing-the-canon-rhetorical-tools-for-21st-century-composition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/2015\/07\/26\/c2-gonzales-and-devoss-remixing-the-canon-rhetorical-tools-for-21st-century-composition\/","title":{"rendered":"C2: Gonzales and DeVoss, “Remixing the Canon: Rhetorical Tools for 21st Century Composition”"},"content":{"rendered":"

Panelists<\/h3>\n

D\u00e0nielle Nicole DeVoss, Michigan State University<\/p>\n

Laura Gonzales, Michigan State University<\/p>\n

Review<\/h3>\n

In \u201cRemixing the Canon: Rhetorical Tools for 21st Century Composition,\u201d Laura Gonzales and D\u00e0nielle Nicole DeVoss challenge us to broaden our theoretical understandings of the rhetorical canon. Gonzales and DeVoss began their session drawing from the work of Cindy Selfe, Steve Westbrook, Collin Brooke, and Diana George, reminding us how \u201cthe visual\u201d and \u201cthe textual\u201d are typically seen as discrete areas of scholarship and pedagogy. Yet, like Gonzales and DeVoss explain, rhet\/comp scholars have been remixing\/remediating the rhetorical canons in attempts to move past just print practices.<\/p>\n

The presenters used this quote as the theoretical underpinning \u00a0for their presentation:<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is time to look to a new mapping of rhetorical activity, one that acknowledges advances in our understanding of language, semiotics, human development, technology, and society\u201d (<\/b>Prior et al<\/b><\/a>, 2007).<\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Gonzales and DeVoss use Prior et al to push against the traditional view of rhetoric, which tends to be focused on linguistic texts and producer-centric. Instead, Gonzales and DeVoss encourage us to see rhetoric as a constellating of examples, always multimodal, and utilizing a variety of semiotic resources.<\/p>\n

\"Design
Figure 1<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

To respond to the challenge posed by Prior et al, Gonzales and DeVoss focus on the intersection of graphic design, civic engagement, and rhetorical theory to reimagine the rhetorical canon. \u00a0Like DeVoss explained, graphic design scholars have used rhetorical theory to inform their theory and pedagogy. \u00a0In fact, DeVoss showed an example of how graphic designers have used rhetorical theory in a book entitled, \u201cDesign Papers: A Rhetorical Handbook\u201d (Figure 1). \u00a0 Because it is uncommon for rhetoric scholars to take up graphic design theory, DeVoss took this opportunity to encourage reading more of this scholarship, particularly of Ellen Lupton<\/a>.<\/p>\n

After explaining the reasonings behind why we might consider remixing the canon and discussing how graphic design theory might help us do that, Gonzales and DeVoss presented the following table:<\/p>\n

\"Slide1\"<\/a><\/p>\n

This table underscores the complex, multimodal, and interactive nature of rhetoric. \u00a0It gives us first the traditional understandings of the canon and then redefines the understandings to be more in-line with our current theoretical understandings and pedagogical practices.<\/p>\n

The presenters then used the sites of their own writing contexts — two undergraduate professional writing\u00a0classes at MSU — as examples of this remixed cannon in action. DeVoss began with an overview of her\u00a0undergraduate Visual Rhetoric course.\u00a0In her course, she students first researched their intended productions and then produced their texts based on the research they found. In this process, their meticulous research in the \u201cinvention\u201d stage helped them later play with organization and style and eventually create memorable, functional projects.<\/p>\n

\"Engaging
Figure 2<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Gonzales then explained how she used this conception of a remixed cannon in her Introduction to Professional Writing course. She began by explaining how we need to combine and adapt the rhetorical cannon with our own communities of practice. Gonzales does this by effectively mapping the remixed rhetorical canons onto elements of the \u201cEngaging Literacies: Civic Engagement Model\u201d developed by Dr. Estrella Torrez at Michigan State University<\/a>. Torrez defines Civic Engagement through the interaction of passion, action, practice, and insight (Figure 2). Unlike many rhetoric courses that only have the exigency of a writing prompt, Gonzales created a community partnership with Dr. Torrez’s Nuestros Cuentos <\/a>project. Nuestros Cuentos is a collaborative initiative\u00a0that connects college students with local youth in Lansing. The purpose of the collaboration is to highlight the\u00a0histories and stories of Indigenous and Latin@ youth in the Lansing School District. Through this partnership, students in Gonzales’ class both learned from Dr. Torrez and her project and engaged\u00a0in meaningful projects that allowed them to learn how to build and maintain relationships.<\/p>\n

\"Nuestros
Figure 3<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Like Gonzales argued, her students learned to be listeners first and then responders; they listened to the knowledge and needs of the community partner, used their own expertise, and effectively worked across difference. For example, when creating the bilingual website for Nuestros Cuentos, her students ultimately decided to put Spanish first given the primary language of most of the audience members that would be viewing the website (Figure 3).<\/p>\n

\"Nuestros<\/a>
Figure 4<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Students\u00a0also began seeing the interconnected nature of rhetoric. \u00a0On a flyer explaining \u201ca day in the life of a student from Nuestros Cuentos\u201d (Figure 4), the students used footsteps as a visual aid to show parents the \u201cpath\u201d that a student takes throughout the day. With Dr. Torrez’s guidance, the students plan\u00a0to share\u00a0these same footprints at an event designed to let parents experience the life of a student–this time on the floor of the event\u2019s halls–to illuminate both the \u201cpath\u201d of the daily life of the students but also the \u201cpath\u201d that the event would take throughout the evening. These examples demonstrated how students effectively mapped the remixed rhetorical cannon onto their own practice.<\/p>\n

Overall, Gonzales and DeVoss did an excellent job in helping us re-think the way that we have typically theorized the rhetorical cannon — and how we have then used this theory in pedagogy. \u00a0In thinking about remixing the cannon, along with exploring their examples of students work, it showcases how important it is to see how rhetorical theory intersects with other theoretical constructs. \u00a0Rhetoric is, like Gonzales and DeVoss argue, embedded in the social, cultural, and material — and we need to continue to re-envision and re-imagine how we might remix our view of the rhetorical cannon to be responsive to that.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Panelists D\u00e0nielle Nicole DeVoss, Michigan State University Laura Gonzales, Michigan State University Review In \u201cRemixing the Canon: Rhetorical Tools for 21st Century Composition,\u201d Laura Gonzales and D\u00e0nielle Nicole DeVoss challenge us to broaden our theoretical understandings of the rhetorical canon. Gonzales and DeVoss began their session drawing from the work of Cindy Selfe, Steve Westbrook,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":42,"featured_media":11499,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[321],"tags":[61,157,390,379],"ppma_author":[1243],"class_list":{"0":"post-11498","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-2015-cw-reviews","8":"tag-computers-and-writing","9":"tag-multimodality","10":"tag-conference-reviews","11":"tag-professional-writing"},"authors":[{"term_id":1243,"user_id":42,"is_guest":0,"slug":"jackifiscus","display_name":"Jacki Fiscus","avatar_url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/406be82733206b1a4e00908113f4b9cb?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","user_url":"","last_name":"Fiscus","first_name":"Jacki","job_title":"","description":"Jacki is a graduate student at the University of Washington. She is primarily interested in multimodal composition, translingualism, and discourse analysis."}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11498","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/42"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11498"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11498\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20390,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11498\/revisions\/20390"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11499"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11498"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11498"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11498"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=11498"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}