![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/Screen-Shot-2017-03-31-at-6.29.45-PM.png\")
As co-assistant directors of the first-year writing program at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, we have been privy to the various challenges faced by composition instructors since the election. In recent months, instructors at UW-Madison have expressed anxiety about providing a safe classroom space for all students; navigating students\u2019 assumptions about the political leanings and motivations of the university; inviting balanced, nuanced, and rigorous discussions about information literacy, credibility, fact, and truth in the classroom; framing lesson plans and larger sequence assignments around information literacy as a key focus; and encouraging critical thinking about the digital landscapes in which students encounter (and share) information.<\/p>\n
To begin addressing some of these anxieties, we designed an ongoing professional development work group where instructors and program administration share ideas, brainstorm strategies, and contribute resources for teaching information literacy in the age of fake news. Specifically, we framed our first meeting around the following questions:<\/p>\n
- \n
- What does the perceived rise of fake news mean for composition instructors?<\/li>\n
- Do our teaching objectives change in the midst of a \u201cpost-truth\u201d era? If so, how?<\/li>\n
- How have we been<\/i> teaching information literacy in the composition classroom?<\/li>\n
- What works and what might need revising considering the prevalence of fake news?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Throughout the semester, instructors have been adding lesson plans to a shared repository and have described successful experiences as well as ongoing challenges. For example, some instructors have reported feeling paranoid that an emphasis on information literacy will be interpreted by students as a partisan stance\u2014that attempting to tackle the problem of fake news will be viewed as an open attack of Trump or of conservatism more broadly. This paranoia feels particularly justified as sites like Professor Watchlist<\/a> encourage students to report the names of their \u201cradical leftist\u201d college instructors.<\/p>\n
We recognize the genuine challenges of teaching composition at this moment, we appreciate the many individuals and groups\u2014in our field and beyond\u2014who are seeking to unpack these challenges, and we are eager to encourage ongoing discussion of these valid anxieties here at UW-Madison. With that said, our work group conversations have also reminded us of the answers and resources already<\/i> available to composition instructors. We are not starting from scratch here. If one of the central goals of teaching composition has always<\/i> been to help students become smarter consumers of information and better ethical communicators, rhetorical education is more relevant than ever. Moving forward, we provide four suggestions which emerged from our work group that can help writing instructors effectively teach information literacy in the current moment:<\/p>\n
1. Take Ownership<\/h3>\n
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/Screen-Shot-2017-03-31-at-6.36.14-PM-300x200.png\")
<\/a>“Learn Digital Media”<\/a> by MyEyeSees<\/a> is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n When we asked instructors about their current approach to teaching information literacy, they overwhelmingly reported relying on campus librarians to teach the basics of research and source evaluation in a one-day library session each semester. Workshop participants quickly concluded that we can no longer farm out the teaching of information literacy solely to librarians or isolate these conversations to a single class period. Instead, we need to make information gathering and evaluation a central concern of the course and of each writing task. Luckily, we\u2019re not the only people who have come to this conclusion. A number of individuals and institutions\u2014including the Stanford History of Education Group<\/a>, the New York Times<\/a>, Digital Pedagogy Lab<\/a>, and Chronicle of Higher Education<\/a>\u2014have crafted lesson plans and pedagogical suggestions for instructors invested in owning the work of teaching information literacy.<\/p>\n
2. Re-emphasize Rhetorical Analysis<\/strong><\/h3>\n
As instructors and scholars of rhetoric and composition, we suggest that we are already well-equipped with a method that can circumvent the concerns of fake news\u2014arguably better equipped than other disciplines to address this cultural concern. The following questions are representative of what we would commonly ask students when performing a rhetorical analysis of a text: What is the context? Who is speaking and on what grounds? What perspectives and biases might they hold? How do they connect with audiences? Who are the intended audiences? What evidence is provided? What underlying assumptions link the evidence to the claim? In what form does the text circulate? What is the effect? These kinds of questions can be just as useful for critiquing the reliability of a text and helping students to think through the process of identifying fake news or non-credible sources.<\/p>\n
3. Share What Works<\/h3>\n
Composition programs and composition instructors as a broader collective can take advantage of (and create) forums for sharing successes\u2014whether they are institutional or programmatic, at the level of an entire course design, an assignment, or an individual lesson. UW-Madison instructors participating in our information literacy work group have created, for example: an assignment where students practice writing their own fake news article in order to better understand and recognize the genre conventions; a week-long unit on reading science news rhetorically<\/a>; and a lesson plan about assessing the credibility and biases of a website. As instructors continue to create resources, we have invited them to include a few key components which are common across our strongest contributions so far:<\/p>\n
- \n
- Specific texts to analyze with students, such as video clips, images, articles, or websites<\/li>\n
- Scholarship around which to frame discussions and analysis<\/li>\n
- Key concepts to emphasize<\/li>\n
- Activities to reinforce learning<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
4. Proceed with Confidence<\/h3>\n
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/Screen-Shot-2017-03-31-at-6.30.03-PM-300x198.png\")
<\/a>Photo<\/a> by Bryce Richter \/ UW-Madison<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n Certainly, concerns about fake news are political concerns; however, we invite instructors to move forward without undue fear of being accused of manipulation or inappropriate politicization if we make information literacy a focus of our courses. Instructors can proceed confidently knowing that rhetorical analysis methods have always been used to tease out the political implications of texts regardless of context or speaker. We can engage in political issues and discussions in the classroom without necessarily making our classrooms political with a capital \u201cP.\u201d For example, to teach information literacy skills and awareness, we do not need to pit ourselves against our Trump supporting students. Rather, we can engage them\u2014and all students of all political persuasions\u2014in nuanced and open discussions about bias, reliability, credibility, audience, and rhetorical situation.<\/p>\n
\u2014\u2014<\/p>\n
New accusations of fake news show up seemingly every day. Undoubtedly, classroom conversations about information literacy will be complicated and constantly shifting. However, as composition instructors, we have always been committed to ethical ways of writing and communicating that are attuned to the concerns of the present moment, whatever that moment may be. Writers must always consider the situations in which they are writing and the situations in which their chosen source material is written. The concerns of the fake news era are certainly not entirely new, and as we develop improved approaches to teaching information literacy, we can also rely on what has always worked before.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
As co-assistant directors of the first-year writing program at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, we have been privy to the various challenges faced by composition instructors since the election. In recent months, instructors at UW-Madison have expressed anxiety about providing a safe classroom space for all students; navigating students\u2019 assumptions about the political leanings and motivations<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":176,"featured_media":14048,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[543],"tags":[91,169,177,199],"ppma_author":[1275,1330],"class_list":{"0":"post-14047","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-blog-carnival-11","8":"tag-drcblogcarnival","9":"tag-pedagogy","10":"tag-reflection","11":"tag-teaching"},"authors":[{"term_id":1330,"user_id":176,"is_guest":0,"slug":"eafindlay","display_name":"Elisa Findlay","avatar_url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/da4fbeb9683027f57f1c5377298ac791?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","user_url":"","last_name":"Findlay","first_name":"Elisa","job_title":"","description":"Elisa Findlay is a PhD student in the Composition and Rhetoric program in the department of English at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She is the current co-Assistant Director of the First-Year Writing Program."},{"term_id":1275,"user_id":125,"is_guest":0,"slug":"stephanierlarson","display_name":"Stephanie Larson","avatar_url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e17ad22649d5d42533398f4f39d26c36?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","user_url":"http:\/\/www.stephanieraelarson.com","last_name":"Larson","first_name":"Stephanie","job_title":"","description":"Stephanie R. Larson is a PhD candidate in Composition and Rhetoric in the department of English at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She is the current Assistant Director of the First-Year Writing Program."}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14047","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/176"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14047"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14047\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20593,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14047\/revisions\/20593"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14048"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14047"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14047"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14047"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=14047"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
- What works and what might need revising considering the prevalence of fake news?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n