broken-link-checker
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114bunyad
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Review by Christian Smith<\/strong><\/p>\n Panelists<\/strong> Given the theme of this year\u2019s conference, the first Town Hall appropriately opened the conference with a thoughtful discussion of space and design in our educational practices. Due to the varied backgrounds of the speakers this was discussed from a variety of perspectives, though\u2014by the end\u2014a common theme did emerge: the need for spaces that were adaptable to a variety of pedagogical goals and could accommodate student difference.<\/p>\n The first speaker, Kathleen Blake Yancey, opened with a discussion of the newly renovated William Johnston Building on Florida State\u2019s campus. Yancey noted that this particular building\u2014with its traditional 19th<\/sup> century exterior and its very 21st<\/sup> century interior\u2014 is indicative of the tensions that exist in education with regards to technology and materials.\u00a0 Discussing the innovative spaces she has worked with <\/i>and in<\/i>, including the Digital Studio<\/a> housed in the Johnston Building, Yancey notes that they were all renovated<\/i> spaces and renovation itself can be a useful metaphor. We are all, as educators, called to renovate the structures\u2014physical and otherwise\u2014we work within.<\/p>\n The next speaker, Russell Carpenter, discussed his experiences directing the Noel Studio for Academic Creativity<\/a> at Eastern Kentucky University. Much of Carpenter\u2019s early experience in that role was spent considering the kinds of spaces that facilitate creative and critical thinking. For Carpenter, this meant spaces that would allow students to work alone and in a variety of group configurations. It also meant spaces that could easily incorporate low and high-tech tools into student work. By designing such spaces, Noel Studio \u00a0would be \u201cinviting, engaging, inspiring, and intuitive\u201d for both students and instructors. Towards the end of his talk, Carpenter asked the audience to think of the kind of immersion often experienced in digital environments and how this experience might be replicated in our physical learning environments. During the discussion, projected images from the Noel Studio demonstrated just how that particular space was designed to provide an immersive learning experience for students and faculty at EKU.<\/p>\n The third speaker, Edward Gomes, discussed Duke University\u2019s innovative teaching and learning center, The Link<\/a>. Inspired by the interior spaces of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Gomes prompted us to think about the kinds of occupational spaces our students will inhabit after<\/i> college. Gomes observed that such spaces are increasingly allowing workers to simply \u201csit and be and do,\u201d as we become more conscious of the relationship between environment and creative productivity. As Gomes walked the audience through images of The Link we could see that it was geared towards private reflective spaces\u2014one such space showed students working feet-up seated in front of a wide green vista\u2014as well as areas for collaborative group work. One notable image showed a group of students who\u2014after filling several white boards in the room\u2014continued to write on the windows! Gomes ended by noting the importance of first observing activities of instructors and students and then <\/i>designing multi-purpose spaces that can both accommodate those activities and anticipate how they might be used in unexpected ways\u2014like windows that can easily double as writing surfaces.<\/p>\n Part of the research and design team at Herman Miller<\/a>, Susan Whitmer, spoke next and followed Gomes\u2019s call for the importance of research when designing a learning space. According to Whitmer, we must identify who will be using the environment and how they use the environments they are currently in. Noting the relationship between particular learning environments and larger ecological issues, Whitmer discussed the need for learning spaces that are adaptable, social, stimulating, healthful, resourceful, and sustainable.<\/p>\n The last speaker for this Town Hall was NC State\u2019s own Robert Beichner who discussed the Student-Centered Active Learning Environment with Upside-down Pedagogies, or the SCALE-UP<\/a> project. SCALE-UP is a nationwide project to redesign large enrollment science and engineering classrooms that will allow for greater collaboration and interaction between students and instructors. One notable example of a SCALE-UP environment is M.I.T.\u2019s Technology Enabled Active Learning (TEAL<\/a>) project. Beichner discussed how students were able to configure within SCALE-UP spaces and the pedagogical affordances this allowed. His presentation also demonstrated the many ways students could use SCALE-UP spaces for things simply not possible in conventional classrooms\u2014like the lecture hall we were \u00a0presently sitting in, a space that Beichner humorously observed only facilitated \u201cdistance learning.\u201d<\/p>\n The Town Hall ended with a brief Q&A during which Kathleen Blake Yancey noted that working within innovative spaces may mean that we have to re-think and re-configure our current assessment models. For me, Yancey\u2019s comment demonstrates the profound link between space and pedagogy and the changes needed if collaboration and shared knowledge production become the prominent modes of learning in education.<\/p>\n Christian Smith<\/strong> is a doctoral candidate in the Composition and Rhetoric program at the University of South Carolina. His research investigates the intersection between rhetoric, media, and cognitive studies.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Review by Christian Smith Panelists Kathleen Blake Yancey, Florida State University Russell Carpenter, Eastern Kentucky University Edward D. Gomes, Jr., Duke University Susan Whitmer, Herman Miller Robert Beichner, North Carolina State University Given the theme of this year\u2019s conference, the first Town Hall appropriately opened the conference with a thoughtful discussion of space and design<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":41,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[],"ppma_author":[1187],"class_list":{"0":"post-2889","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-2012-cw-reviews"},"authors":[{"term_id":1187,"user_id":41,"is_guest":0,"slug":"sweetlanddrc","display_name":"Sweetland DRC","avatar_url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/136c600b4be646d920bdf4df01e902a8?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","user_url":"","last_name":"","first_name":"Sweetland DRC","job_title":"","description":""}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2889","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/41"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2889"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2889\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2889"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2889"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2889"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=2889"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nKathleen Blake Yancey, Florida State University
\nRussell Carpenter, Eastern Kentucky University
\nEdward D. Gomes, Jr., Duke University
\nSusan Whitmer, Herman Miller
\nRobert Beichner, North Carolina State University<\/p>\n