Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the broken-link-checker domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the bunyad domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/drcprod/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893
{"id":9688,"date":"2014-10-31T13:05:08","date_gmt":"2014-10-31T17:05:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/?p=9052"},"modified":"2014-12-22T21:07:32","modified_gmt":"2014-12-23T02:07:32","slug":"linguistic-prejudice-and-a-call-for-epistemic-rights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/2014\/10\/31\/linguistic-prejudice-and-a-call-for-epistemic-rights\/","title":{"rendered":"Linguistic Prejudice and a Call for Epistemic Rights"},"content":{"rendered":"

In her 2013 memoir PHD to Ph.D.: How Education Saved My Life<\/i><\/a>, Elaine Richardson writes of school English:<\/p>\n

\n
\u201cIt looks you in the face and tells you, you don\u2019t even know what you know\u201d (200).<\/p>\n
$\"Dr.$ <\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
In doing so, Richardson names the harms of diminishing one\u2019s ways of knowing, experiencing, and explaining the world. For this blog post, I\u2019d like to zoom in on two key terms that also help to explain these harms and suggest a way for countering them:<\/p>\n
(1) epistemic injustice<\/em>, or harm done to a person\u2019s capacity as a knower, and
\n(2) epistemic rights<\/em>, or the right to one\u2019s own knowledge, experience, and earned expertise.<\/p>\n
Through work on a larger project, I have come to believe that the terms and related framework of epistemic injustice<\/i> and epistemic rights <\/i>are crucial. They are crucial for explaining the wrong of school English when it strips writers of their sense of knowing and their attendant agency, confidence, and even personhood. They are crucial for identifying, describing, and responding to the wrongdoing\u2014the microaggressions<\/a> and larger injustices\u2014that Richardson<\/a> recounts and that many scholars (e.g., Powell<\/a>; Smitherman<\/a>; Villanueva<\/a>; Young<\/a>) have documented. And they are crucial in indicating the need to rethink single language \/ single modality approaches, which allow for, if not directly support, epistemic injustice enabled by linguistic prejudice<\/a>.<\/p>\n
A number of philosophers and sociolinguists alike have taken up questions of epistemic agency, (in)justice, entitlement, and rights. Among these researchers, Miranda Fricker<\/a> provides an in-depth analysis in her 2007 book Epistemic Injustice<\/i><\/a>. <\/i>Fricker identifies two types of epistemic injustice\u2014testimonial injustice<\/i> and hermeneutical injustice<\/i>\u2014and explores the associations among power, prejudice, and the ethics of knowing. Fricker provides these definitions:<\/p>\n
\u201cTestimonial injustice occurs when prejudice causes a hearer to give a deflated level of credibility to a speaker\u2019s word; hermeneutical injustice occurs at a prior stage, when a gap in collective interpretive resources puts someone at an unfair disadvantage when it comes to making sense of their social experiences.\u201d (1)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Both types of epistemic injustice are enabled by prejudice, and both are related to writing and writing instruction. To illustrate, because testimonial injustice impacts a writer\u2019s credibility and reception, it helps us to see the links among seemingly innocuous feedback, linguistic privilege and prejudice, wider systems of power and oppression, and the marginalization and dehumanization of writers.<\/p>\n
Epistemic injustice can arise in all sorts of human interactions, spoken and written. Around writing, testimonial injustice often involves linguistic prejudice, which leads readers to unfairly deflate or dismiss some <\/i>writers\u2019 credibility, as discussed in the policy statement SRTOL<\/a> and subsequent and continuing work on language diversity<\/a> and translingualism<\/a>. This injustice results in a whole host of primary and secondary harms, including attacks on a person\u2019s authority and, subsequently, on their personhood and human value. Think here of Gloria Anzald\u00faa<\/a>\u2019s line:<\/p>\n
\u201cSo, if you want to really hurt me, talk badly about my language\u201d (How to Tame a Wild Tongue<\/i><\/a>, para. 27).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Primary and secondary harms impact individuals on three levels: personally, socially, and structurally. For instance, persistent epistemic injustice may result in internal impacts like the loss of intellectual courage, lowered self-confidence, and hindered educational development (Fricker, chapter 3). As with other micro-inequities<\/a> and microaggressions<\/a> (i.e., systemic inequities that are enacted in small and often implicit, but no-less cumulative and consequential, ways), the impact of epistemic injustice cumulates over time and feeds the very prejudices and related injustices that support and bring it about.<\/p>\n
To counter epistemic injustice, I ask that we actively recognize writers\u2019 epistemic rights<\/a>. We don\u2019t often use this term epistemic rights<\/i> in the field of composition and rhetoric, but I see value in adopting an understanding of rights as related to entitlement to experience or knowledge\u2014the basis on which we write or ask students to write. My understanding of epistemic rights comes from sociolinguistics research by Harvey Sacks<\/a> (who distinguished between first-hand and removed rights to personal experience) and John Heritage and Geoffrey Raymond<\/a> (who studied how individuals rank their rights to assess by upgrading and downgrading assertions through conversational turns). Their research<\/a> has informed my investigation into epistemic rights, which I define more broadly, and yet quite literally, as rights to experience, knowledge, and earned expertise. My research shows that when working collaboratively in sustained relationships, writers are able to upgrade their epistemic rights to make strong assertions relative to audiences who have greater institutional power and more implicit right to speak.<\/p>\n
The framework of epistemic injustice and epistemic rights helps us to name the wrong done when school English\u2014that is, a single language \/ single modality approach to school English\u2014\u201clooks you in the face and tells you, you don\u2019t even know what you know\u201d (Richardson 200). The framework of epistemic rights helps us to connect students\u2019 right to their own language<\/a> with the related rights to experience, express, name, narrate, and know<\/i>. These are rights to your own experience, knowledge, and earned expertise. Too often writers are denied these rights because of complex and intertwined prejudices, including linguistic prejudice. A concrete step toward upholding them is naming them as rights<\/a>.<\/p>\n
Only a short bit can be accomplished in a brief blog post. My hope is that this post begins to outline two central terms\u2014epistemic injustice<\/i> and epistemic rights<\/i>\u2014and to preview a much larger argument for why this framework is needed in composition and rhetoric. By countering epistemic injustice and instead recognizing writers\u2019 epistemic rights, we can work against the harms associated with a single language\/modality \u201cstandard\u201d<\/a> on which other ways of speaking, writing, and knowing are diminished. We can work against some languages being endowed with prestige, while others stigmatized. And we can envision new multi-, trans- approaches that articulate, recognize, and respect all writers\u2019 rights.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In her 2013 memoir PHD to Ph.D.: How Education Saved My Life, Elaine Richardson writes of school English: \u201cIt looks you in the face and tells you, you don\u2019t even know what you know\u201d (200). In doing so, Richardson names the harms of diminishing one\u2019s ways of knowing, experiencing, and explaining the world. For this<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":62,"featured_media":9976,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[134,138,189],"ppma_author":[1235],"class_list":{"0":"post-9688","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-blog-carnival-5","8":"tag-language-and-modality","9":"tag-linguistic-diversity","10":"tag-social-justice"},"authors":[{"term_id":1235,"user_id":62,"is_guest":0,"slug":"bethgodbee","display_name":"Beth Godbee","avatar_url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e2a820653b9258f14cdff9f1a057ab1?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","user_url":"","last_name":"Godbee","first_name":"Beth","job_title":"","description":"Beth Godbee is Assistant Professor of English at Marquette University. She studies how collaborative writing talk (and the relationship-building, writing, revision, and rethinking involved in that talk) can bring about more equitable relations for writers and members of their social networks."}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9688","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/62"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9688"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9688\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9977,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9688\/revisions\/9977"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9976"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9688"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9688"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9688"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=9688"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}