Introduction
Presents an overview of the goals of this webtext. More
History
Tells the history of the Noel Studio for Academic Creativity. More
Spaces
Shows how the space is being used by faculty and students. More
Flexibility
Discusses the importance of furniture and technology. More
Students
Offers video interviews of people who use the Noel Studio. More
Conclusion
Summarizes the main arguments made in this webtext. More
Conclusion
Employing student interviews and hourly observations as our primary method for understanding the role space plays in the composing process of college students, we suggest that space facilitates a process of play that can serve important functions as students design composition projects. Through these video narratives, we explain how the Noel Studio’s space enables creative expression and how that experience translates into stronger composition products. Through this experiment, students have helped us visualize the “journey of composition” as they might move from project to project, space to space, from one form of low- and high-tech resource to another, as they brainstorm, write, revise, seek feedback, revise, and polish their communication projects.
Through this visualization of composition, we suggest that space can facilitate play—a divergent process where students are free to experiment and engage ideas that only exist as glimmers in other campus spaces. The Noel Studio encourages expression as part of the composition process and understands that students can find their voice or passion in spaces that allow them to explore on their own terms.Play serves an important pedagogical purpose, especially when students are learning to compose through new or unfamiliar modes and media. Establishing a low-pressure, safe environment where students feel comfortable trying new approaches, learning from and with others, and responding to the compositions of other students sends a message that making mistakes is acceptable. Incorporating creative play as part of the Noel Studio’s pedagogy suggests that compositions involve a recursive process and one that is open to experimentation at all levels and stages. A space that facilitates play immerses students within this creative experience.
References
Azzam, Amy M. 2009. Why creativity now? A conversation with Sir Ken Robinson. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/sept09/vol67/num01/Why-Creativity-Now%C2%A2-A-Conversation-with-Sir-Ken-Robinson.aspx
Boczkowski, Derek, Ian Randall, Truly Render, and Sarah Sinovic. 2008. Publicity, play, pedagogy: The story of the never-ending story. In Kevin Dvorak and Shanti Bruce, eds., Creative Approaches to Writing Center Work, 261–277. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Brown, Tim. 2008. Tales of Creativity and Play. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/tim_brown_on_creativity_and_play.html
Brown, Sunni. 2011. Sunni Brown: Doodlers unite! Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/sunni_brown.html
Doorley, Scott, and Scott Witthoft. 2012. Make Space: How to Set the Stage for Creative Collaboration. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
National Institute for Play. 2009. Play science: The patterns of play. Retrieved from http://www.nifplay.org/science/pattern-play
Newcomb, Matthew. 2012. Sustainability as a design principle for composition: Situational creativity as a habit of mind. College Composition and Communication 63(4), 593–615.
New London Group. 1996, Spring. A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review 66(1), 60–92.
Reiss, Donna, and Art Young. 2013. Multimodal composing, appropriation, remediation, and reflection: Writing, literature, and media. In Tracey Bowen and Carl Whithaus, eds., Multimodal Literacies and Emerging Genres, 164–182. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Reynolds, Nedra. 2004. Geographies of Writing: Inhabiting Places and Encouraging Difference. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Rouzie, Albert. 2000. Beyond the dialectic of work and play: A serio-ludic rhetoric for composition studies. Journal of Advanced Composition 20(3), 627–658.
Sweet, Charlie, Russell Carpenter, Hal Blythe, and Shawn Apostel. 2013.Teaching Applied Creative Thinking: A New Pedagogy for the 21st Century. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
Trimbur, John. 2000. Multiliteracies, social futures, and writing centers. Writing Center Journal 20(2), 29–32.
Verbais, Chad. 2008. Incorporating play and toys into the writing center. In Kevin Dvorak and Shanti Bruce, eds., Creative Approaches to Writing Center Work, 135–146. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.