100 YEARS OF NEW MEDIA PEDAGOGY

1. Prelude

1. Trailer
2. Introduction
3. Behind the Scenes

2. Methodological Play

1. Introduction
2. Thin Description & Data Visualization
3. Media Archaeology
4. Multimodal Performance
5. Methods of Data Collection and Coding

3. Visualizing the Archive

1. Introduction
2. Trends Across the Corpus
3. Radio
4. Film & Video
5. Television
6. Computer
7. Word Frequencies by Decade
8. Zooming Out

4. Listening to Audio Pedagogies

1. Introduction
2. English via the Airwaves
3. Mid-Century Audio Recording Pedagogies
4. Afterlives of Radio
5. Pedagogical Inspirations

5. Re-Seeing Film & Video Pedagogies

1. Introduction
2. Silent Film Devils
3. Making Movies in the 30s
4. Super-8 and Camcorder Fun
5. Pedagogical Inspirations

6. Remembering the “Perils” of Television

1. Introduction
2. TV Talk
3. McLuhan Redesigning Pedagogy
4. Pedagogical Inspirations

7. Conversing With Computers

1. Introduction
2. Act 1: Imagining Computer Futures
3. Act 2: PC Software Revolutions
4. Act 3: A Networked Social Turn
5. Act 4: Reading & Writing the Web
6. Act 5: Digital, Multimodal Literacies
7. Pedagogical Inspirations

8. Coda: Back to the Future

1. Introduction
2. The 7 Keys to Multimodal Pedagogy
3. Can You Really Believe They Said That?
4. The 5 Weirdest Classroom Technologies
5. Which English Journal Author Are You?
6. Playing in the Archives

9. Credits

1. Acknowledgements
2. References
3. Production Notes

Conversing With Computers

Act 5: Digital, Multimodal Literacies, 2004–2012

• Click to view transcript

  
  

  Digital Multimodal Literacies, 2004–2012: A Digital Storytelling Project (.txt version)
  

  [Audio: light-hearted soundtrack plays throughout]

  [Video: image of laptop, with smartphone sitting on open notebook; caption overlays read: “Act Five: Digital Multimodal Literacies, 2004–2012 (a digital storytelling project)”]

  [Video: image of students working in computer classroom; caption overlay includes timeline of articles featuring computer pedagogy; cut to image of cover of Kress and van Leeuwen’s Multimodal Discourse wearing cowboy hat and coming through saloon doors; cut to screen capture footage of editing in iMovie; image montage of audio recorder, Flip video camera, iPhone, colored pencils, websites mentioned in narration, Farrell’s English Education and the Electronic Revolution, and child holding digital camera]

  Jason: Welcome to our digital story about the exciting evolution of computer pedagogies from 2004 to 2012. In this era, teachers continued experimenting with email, word processing, discussion boards, website evaluation, and desktop publishing. But the real new kids in town were multimodal composing and Web 2.0 applications. Although the computer usually played a role in these new multimodal pedagogies, students were using a range of technologies for crafting multimodal texts. These included audio recorders, digital still and video cameras, smart phones, drawing pencils, and more. And students were publishing their work not just on stand-alone websites, but on a variety of online platforms with robust multimodal capabilities, from blogs, to wikis, to YouTube and beyond! At this moment, we finally see the multimedia computer dreams of the sixties coming true, but this time students were doing the making. And that made all the difference!

  [Video: image montage including Kajder article, Center for Digital Storytelling homepage, hand-drawn storyboard, Apple “Podcast Resources” web page]

  Ben: The multimodal turn in English Journal really kicked off in 2004, with an article about digital storytelling by Sara Kajder. Students in Kajder’s class told personal stories about their lives that combined vocal narration with still photos and a musical soundtrack to create a video that was published straight to compact disc. As part of the process, students composed multimodal storyboards to help them make conscious rhetorical choices about how they were layering image, voice, and music, engaging in a recursive process of reflection that remains crucial for multimodal composing assignments to this day. With the rise of podcasting, we saw a renewed emphasis on students telling their own stories with their own embodied voices.

  [Video: image montage including Goodsen and Skillen article, historic photo of girls producing radio program]

  Ben: In 2010, Goodson and Skillen discussed a project in which students created podcasts where they documented their own experiences of rural living, complete with sound effects and music. Here we can see how digital audio technologies breathed new life into public audio composing pedagogies that date all the way back to the 1930s.

  [Video: image montage including cover of McCloud’s Making Comics, Comic Life homepage, Ruble and Lysne article, poster for film Spirited Away, series of photos from Ruble and Lysne article of students producing anime film projects]

  Jason: We also noticed a surge of interest in comics and animation that teachers connected to computer literacy. Using programs such as Comic Life, students were making their own comics, combining hand-drawn visuals with images culled from the web. And, in one our favorite articles, an English, a Social Studies, and a Visual Arts teacher taught a collaborative unit about the anime film, Spirited Away, focusing on its rhetorical choices, social contexts, and environmental themes. For the final project, students worked in both their English and Art classes to craft their own animated shorts tackling local environmental issues. Students composed their animated movies by taking photos of hand-crafted scenes and then combining them in a digital video editor. Here was another case of teachers embracing a hacker ethic of repurposing everyday objects for multimodal composition.

  [Video: screen capture of YouTube video sharing sequence; cut to image of HTML source code, clip of historic Grapes of Wrath footage; image montage including mural depicting migrant rights imagery, immigration reform protest signs]

  Jason: As the twenty-first century really started rolling, student website projects also grew increasingly multimodal. In 2007, Jeff House’s class built a multimedia website about The Grapes of Wrath. Not only did the website share archival materials from the 1930s, but students also created photographic and video content that argued on behalf of farm worker rights and migrant justice in California, including footage of 2006 immigration reform protests. Students taking action on the web and in the streets . . . that’s the kind of digital humanities pedagogy we need today!

  [Video: image montage including screenshots of xanga.com, Facebook, NetNanny, and Wikispaces homepages]

  Ben: Interest in web publishing was further ramped up by the rise of free blogging software that made web composing simpler (though a little more constrained). Facebook was mentioned regularly in articles after 2008, though teachers mostly weren’t bringing it directly into classrooms. For example, Gibbons noted that Facebook was blocked by his school’s internet filter, so he turned to wiki writing as a different way of bringing social media composing into his classroom.

  [Video: screencapture of editing of Wikipedia’s English Journal entry; cut to image montage of Crovitz and Smoot article, Wikipedia logo]

  Ben: In addition to promoting online collaboration, the rise of wikis also provoked new worries about digital misinformation. While many teachers were arguing that Wikipedia should be banned as a source, teachers like Darren Crovitz and W. Scott Smoot suggested that students should engage in collaboratively researching and authoring their own Wikipedia articles as way of developing a critical understanding of the site.

  [Video: “awesome face” emoji with caption overlay reading “Web 2.0 is sooo awesome!!!”; cut to image montage including old radio, television set, film camera, HyperStudio home page, “Beyond Cyberpunk” Hypercard stack]

  Ben: With all the excitement about new multimodal Web 2.0 technologies, we noted that most articles in this period didn’t situate their digital pedagogies in relation to older technologies like radio, television, film, and early hypermedia —they tended to frame multimodal composing as solely a twenty-first century phenomenon.

  [Video: image montage including English Journal cover (100 Year anniversary issue), Hicks et al. article, image from opening; caption overlay is of quotation read by Ben in narration below]

  Jason: But, the hundred-year anniversary of the journal in 2012 provoked some much-needed historical reflection. In “Same as It Ever Was: Enacting the Promise of Teaching, Writing, and New Media,” Hicks, Young, Kajder, and Hunt made a compelling call for teachers to dig deeper into the history of using technology in the English classroom. Knowing that history, the authors argued, would ultimately help teachers make more effective and innovative use of current technologies. We leave you with a quote from this essay that has been inspirational for our entire project:

  Ben: “If we had but one sentiment to share with readers of this article, this would most likely be it: Stop waiting for the technology of tomorrow to compel you to do the work of today. [. . .] We have the opportunity to learn from the history of English Journal authors, to see what they’ve noted, and to understand that we, right now, can make important changes” (Hicks et al. 2012).

  Jason: We couldn’t agree more!

  [Video: closing credits read “Images, audio, and video content used in this digital storytelling project are either sourced from Creative Commons-Licensed sites, original content, or used in accordance with our Statement of Fair Use. For a complete list of items included here, please see the appendix of this book.”]

next page